Tests of alternative evolutionary models are needed to enhance our understanding of biological invasions.
Authors of this article are:
Burns JH, Murphy JE, Zheng YL.
A summary of the article is shown below:
Comparing models of trait evolution might generate new insights into the role of evolutionary history in biological invasions. Assumptions underlying Darwin’s naturalization conundrum suggest that close relatives are functionally similar. However, newer work is suggesting more complex relationships between phylogenetic and functional distance. We present an example where communities of close relatives are functional divergent in leaf traits and have greater invader biomass. Such an approach leads to new questions, such as: When might selection lead to divergence between close relatives? For example, a history of sympatry might correspond with divergence. We suggest that moving beyond a simplistic version of Darwin’s naturalization conundrum as alternative hypotheses will lead to a more nuanced view how evolution has shaped biological invasions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Check out the article’s website on Pubmed for more information:
This article is a good source of information and a good way to become familiar with topics such as:
Brownian motion;Darwin’s naturalization conundrum;Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis;Ornstein-Uhlenbeck;Phylogeny;biological invasion;evolution;macroevolution
Categories: Science News