Science News

Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success.

A new interesting article has been published in Int J Legal Med. 2018 Oct 19. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1955-9. [Epub ahead of print] and titled:

Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success.

Authors of this article are:

Zeng X, Elwick K, Mayes C, Takahashi M, King JL, Gangitano D, Budowle B, Hughes-Stamm S.

A summary of the article is shown below:

Skeletal remains recovered from missing persons’ cases are often exposed to harsh environmental conditions resulting in the DNA being damaged, degraded, and/or the samples containing PCR inhibitors. In this study, the efficacy of common extraction methods was evaluated to remove high levels of PCR inhibitors commonly encountered with human remains, and their downstream compatibility with the two leading sequencing chemistries and platforms for human identification purposes. Blood, hair, and bone samples were spiked with high levels of inhibitors commonly identified in each particular substrate in order to test the efficiency of various DNA extraction methods prior to sequencing. Samples were extracted using three commercial extraction kits (DNA IQ™, DNA Investigator, and PrepFiler® BTA), organic (blood and hair only), and two total demineralization protocols (bone only)). Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) was performed using two different systems: Precision ID chemistry and a custom AmpliSeq™ STR and iiSNP panel on the Ion S5™ System and the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the MiSeq FGx™. The overall results showed that all DNA extraction methods were efficient and are fully compatible with both MPS systems. Key performance indicators such as STR and SNP reportable alleles, read depth, and heterozygote balance were comparable for each extraction method. In samples where CE-based STRs yielded partial profiles (bone), MPS-based STRs generated more complete or full profiles. Moreover, MPS panels contain more STR loci than current CE-based STR kits and also include SNPs, which can further increase the power of discrimination obtained from these samples, making MPS a desirable choice for the forensic analysis of such challenging samples.

Check out the article’s website on Pubmed for more information:



This article is a good source of information and a good way to become familiar with topics such as:

DNA extraction;Ion S5™;Massively parallel sequencing;MiSeq FGx™;Missing persons;PCR inhibitors

.

Categories: Science News