Science News

Student Choice in Higher Education—Reducing or Reproducing Social Inequalities?

A new article has been published in the journal

Social Sciences

under the title:

Student Choice in Higher Education—Reducing or Reproducing Social Inequalities?

Authors of the work are:

Callender, Claire; Dougherty, Kevin J.

These authors are affiliated with:

Institute of Education, University College London and Birkbeck, University of London, 26 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DQ, UK

A summary of the work is shown below:

A hallmark of recent higher education policy in developed economies is the move towards quasi-markets involving greater student choice and provider competition, underpinned by cost-sharing policies. This paper examines the idealizations and illusions of student choice and marketization in higher education policy in England, although the overall conclusions have relevance for other countries whose higher education systems are shaped by neoliberal thinking. First, it charts the evolution of the student-choice rationale through an analysis of government commissioned reports, white papers, and legislation, focusing on policy rhetoric and the purported benefits of increasing student choice and provider competition. Second, the paper tests the predictions advanced by the student-choice rationale—increased and wider access, improved institutional quality, and greater provider responsiveness to the labour market—and finds them largely not met. Finally, the paper explores how conceptual deficiencies in the student-choice model explain why the idealization of student choice has largely proved illusionary. Government officials have narrowly conceptualized students as rational calculators primarily weighing the economic costs and benefits of higher education and the relative quality of institutions and programs. There is little awareness that student choices are shaped by several other factors as well and that these vary considerably by social background. The paper concludes that students’ choices are socially constrained and stratified, reproducing and legitimating social inequality.

This work provides useful insights about topics such as: higher education; social inequality; choice; quasi-markets; student financial aid; part-time students; marketization; neoliberalism.

For more information about this work and full text download please visit the journal’s website: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/socsci

DOI: 10.3390/socsci7100189

Categories: Science News